As part of the work on our review of the Fujifilm X100VI, we've shot and processed our standard studio test images with the camera. Our test scene is designed to simulate a variety of textures, colors and detail types you'll encounter in the real world.

It also has two illumination modes to see the effect of different lighting conditions.

$(document). ready(function() { ImageComparisonWidget({"containerId":"reviewImageComparisonWidget-31364877","widgetId":918,"initialStateId":null}) })Recent Videos

Given the camera is based on a sensor we've seen before, there are few surprizes in terms of its performance. It produces more detail than the 26MP sensor in the X100V$(document). ready(function() { $("#icl-5922--942022866"). click(function() { ImageComparisonWidgetLink(5922); }); }). Inevitably it shows more noise at the pixel level than lower-res sensors, but is comparable when viewed at the same output size$(document). ready(function() { $("#icl-5923--822446852"). click(function() { ImageComparisonWidgetLink(5923); }); }), up until the very highest ISO settings$(document). ready(function() { $("#icl-5924-1412444404"). click(function() { ImageComparisonWidgetLink(5924); }); }).

Lens performance

The studio scene is not intended as a lens test: we typically use very high-performance lenses at an aperture that delivers high levels of cross-frame consistency with little risk of diffraction limiting the performance. However, with the X100VI, we have no choice but to use the built-in lens.

The 35mm equiv field of view means we have to move much closer to the target but this is still at over 40x focal length, so not especially close-up. An aperture value of F5. 6 means we're not being especially challenging.

And the X100VI's lens appears to acquit itself well in these circumstances. In the JPEGs it's comparably detailed near the center as the X-H2's results, using our standard 56mm F1. 2 R testing lens (though the X100VI is possibly having to apply more sharpening$(document). ready(function() { $("#icl-5925--466670728"). click(function() { ImageComparisonWidgetLink(5925); }); }) to deliver this result). Things get a little softer towards the corners and exhibit (easily corrected) lateral chromatic aberration and some vignetting in the Raw conversion, but overall the lens appears to be doing a good job in front of a high-resolution sensor.

As with all the other 40MP X-Trans cameras, the Adobe Camera Raw conversion isn't showing the same levels of contrast or sharpening that the camera's own JPEGs do, so it's worth downloading the Raw files to see whether your preferred software and processing workflow produce results you're happier with. But overall, we feel it does well.

2024-4-23 17:00